Human rights and comparative foreign policy / edited by David P. Forsythe.

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Introduction / David P. Forsythe -- US foreign policy and human rights : the price of principles after the Cold War / David P. Forsythe -- Trials and errors : the Netherlands and human rights / Peter R. Baehr -- British foreign policy and human rights : from low to high politics / Sally Morphet -- Japan's foreign policy towards human rights : uncertain changes / Yozo Yokota and Chiyuki Aoi -- Russian foreign policy and human rights : conflicted culture and uncertain policy / Sergei V. Chugrov -- India's human rights diplomacy : crisis and transformation / Sanjoy Banerjee -- Iran and human rights / Zachary Karabell -- Human rights and foreign policy in Central Europe : Hungary, the Czech Republic, and Poland / Gabor Kardos -- Human rights and foreign policy in post-apartheid South Africa / Tiyanjana Maluwa -- Latin American foreign policies and human rights / Cristina Eguizabal -- An overview / Jack Donnelly -- Postscript : the Kosovo Crisis / David P. Forsythe.

Human Rights and Comparative Foreign Policy</em> is the first book in English to examine the place of human rights in the foreign policies of a wide range of states during contemporary times. The book is also unique in utilizing a common framework of analysis for all 10 of the country or regional studies covered. This framework treats foreign policy as the result of a two-level game in which both domestic and foreign factors have to be considered. Leading experts from around the world analyze both liberal democratic and other foreign policies on human rights. A general introduction and a systematic conclusion add to the coherence of the project. The authors note the increasing attention given to human rights issues in contemporary foreign policy. At the same time, they argue that most states, including liberal democratic states that identify with human rights, are reluctant most of the time to elevate human rights concerns to a level equal to that of traditional security and economic concerns. When states do seek to integrate human rights with these and other concerns, the result is usually great inconsistency in patterns of foreign policy. The book further argues that different states bring different emphasis to their human rights diplomacy, because of such factors as national political culture and perceived national interests. In the last analysis states can be compared along two dimensions pertaining to human rights: extent to which they are oriented toward an international rather than national conception of rights; and extent to which they are oriented toward international rather than national action to protect human rights.